<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chairman&#8217;s Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://independenceamerica.com/events/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://independenceamerica.com</link>
	<description>America&#039;s Next Major Party</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:45:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: keiserj</title>
		<link>http://independenceamerica.com/events/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>keiserj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independenceamerica.com/?page_id=7#comment-8</guid>
		<description>A gathering of academicians drawn from a range of disciplines will meet on April 7, 2010, at Wagner College, Staten Island, New York, to examine the declining state of the male, stemming from cataclysmic changes in today’s culture, environment and global economy. The live teleconferenced colloquium will be co-chaired by Judith Kleinfeld, PhD, Professor of Psychology and Director of the Boys Project at the University of Alaska, and Lionel Tiger, PhD, Rutgers University Charles Darwin Professor of Anthropology. It will encompass a broad range of topics relevant to the study of boys and men in contemporary society ranging from their roles in the family and workforce, as well as their physical and emotional health, to the growing problem of misandry—the hatred of males, an unacknowledged but underlying socio-cultural, economic, political and legal phenomenon endangering the well-being of both genders.

http://www.malestudies.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A gathering of academicians drawn from a range of disciplines will meet on April 7, 2010, at Wagner College, Staten Island, New York, to examine the declining state of the male, stemming from cataclysmic changes in today’s culture, environment and global economy. The live teleconferenced colloquium will be co-chaired by Judith Kleinfeld, PhD, Professor of Psychology and Director of the Boys Project at the University of Alaska, and Lionel Tiger, PhD, Rutgers University Charles Darwin Professor of Anthropology. It will encompass a broad range of topics relevant to the study of boys and men in contemporary society ranging from their roles in the family and workforce, as well as their physical and emotional health, to the growing problem of misandry—the hatred of males, an unacknowledged but underlying socio-cultural, economic, political and legal phenomenon endangering the well-being of both genders.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malestudies.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.malestudies.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keiserj</title>
		<link>http://independenceamerica.com/events/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>keiserj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independenceamerica.com/?page_id=7#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hello Frank 
 
 My name is John Keiser and I&#039;m looking to run for New York State Senator seat for district 024 out of Staten Island. I would like to run under the Independence Party so I&#039;m looking to you for help. I would like to run to reform New York state Civil Rights laws such as Family Rights, The right to pursue happiness, Equal Reproductive Rights and Fathers Rights to there children to remove the Federal and State government family court system out of the house hold and let the parents be parents of there own children. Let me start by saying I became a single father at age 20 of my son. So this is not about me not wanting to pay child support in fact my son’s mother O’s my son over $35,000 in child support. 

  So lets start making a change from the bottom up everyone know a person that is a part of the family court system hell I think it show up in statistics that more then 57% of all US family are in the family court system. So that gives use a lot of votes and the total amount of males in the court system to females are 3 to 1 that means three men to every one women. So that means we can go and get the male votes because for every 1 males vote he has 5 male friends this is something we can run with now is the time. I’m copying some info from A website on family court statistics http://www.childrensjustice.org/stats.htm

  Statistics
&quot;Ninety percent of divorced fathers have less than full custody of their children.&quot; Jonathan M. Honeycutt, Ph.D.(c), M.P.A., M.A., I.P.C. Director of Research, Clinical &amp; Consulting Psychotherapist, National Institute for Divorce Research, Panama City, Florida.
 
Children from fatherless homes account for:
·	63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept. of Health &amp; Human Services, Bureau of the Census). 
·	71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US Dept. of Health &amp; Human Services) 
·	90% of all homeless and runaway children. 
·	70% of juveniles in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988) 
·	85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control). 
·	80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger. (Source: Criminal Justice &amp; Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26, 1978). 
·	71% of all high school dropouts. (Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools). 
·	75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God`s Children). 
·	85% of all youths sitting in prisons. (Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections 1992). 
 
The State of Fatherhood
·	37.9% of fathers have no access/visitation rights. (Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 &amp; 5, Census Bureau P-60, #173, Sept 1991.) 
·	&quot;40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the non-custodial father&#039;s visitation on at least one occasion, to punish the ex-spouse.&quot; (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of Orthopsychiatry, 1991.) 
·	&quot;Overall, approximately 50% of mothers &quot;see no value in the father`s continued contact with his children....&quot; (Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly &amp; Judith Wallerstein, p. 125) 
·	Only 11% of mothers value their husband&#039;s input when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers &amp; doctors rated 45%, and close friends &amp; relatives rated 16%.(Source: EDK Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November 1994, p. 36) 
·	&quot;The former spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent contact with the children.&quot; (Source: Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July 1991.) 
·	&quot;A clear majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their children.&quot; (Source: Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock &amp; Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.) 
·	&quot;Very few of the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their fathers, after divorce.&quot; (Source: Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch &amp; Lowery, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.) 
·	&quot;Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes sabotage father&#039;s efforts to visit their children.&quot; (Source: Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July `93.) 
·	&quot;Mothers may prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their marital or post-marital relationship.&quot; (Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer &amp; Charing, Journal of Marriage &amp; the Family, Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.) 
·	In a study: &quot;Visitational Interference - A National Study&quot; by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers are NOT able to &quot;visit&quot; their children, as ordered by the court, as a result of &quot;visitation interference&quot; perpetuated by the custodial parent. In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept. 1992 
 
Child Support
·	Information from multiple sources shows that only 10% of all noncustodial fathers fit the &quot;deadbeat dad&quot; category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of those with NO visitation rights still financially support their children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173). 
·	Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report: GAO/HRD-92-39 FS). 
·	The Poverty Studies Institute at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, discovered in 1993 that 52% of fathers who owe child support earn less than $6,155 per year. 
·	66% of single mothers work less than full time while only 10% of fathers fall into this category. In addition, almost 47% of non-custodial mothers default on support compared with the 27% of fathers who default. (Source: Garansky and Meyer, DHHS Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, 1991). 
·	Total Custodial Mothers: 11,268,000. Total Custodial Fathers 2,907,000 (Source: Current Population Reports, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Series P-20, No. 458, 1991). 
·	66% of all support not paid by non-custodial fathers is due to inability to pay. (Source: U.S. General Accounting Office Report, GAO/HRD-92-39FS January 1992). 
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security Policy, Oct. 1991, Authors: Meyer and Garansky. 
·	Custodial mothers who receive a support award: 79.6% 
·	Custodial fathers who receive a support award: 29.9% 
·	Non-custodial mothers who totally default on support: 46.9% 
·	Non-custodial fathers who totally default on support: 26.9%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Frank </p>
<p> My name is John Keiser and I&#8217;m looking to run for New York State Senator seat for district 024 out of Staten Island. I would like to run under the Independence Party so I&#8217;m looking to you for help. I would like to run to reform New York state Civil Rights laws such as Family Rights, The right to pursue happiness, Equal Reproductive Rights and Fathers Rights to there children to remove the Federal and State government family court system out of the house hold and let the parents be parents of there own children. Let me start by saying I became a single father at age 20 of my son. So this is not about me not wanting to pay child support in fact my son’s mother O’s my son over $35,000 in child support. </p>
<p>  So lets start making a change from the bottom up everyone know a person that is a part of the family court system hell I think it show up in statistics that more then 57% of all US family are in the family court system. So that gives use a lot of votes and the total amount of males in the court system to females are 3 to 1 that means three men to every one women. So that means we can go and get the male votes because for every 1 males vote he has 5 male friends this is something we can run with now is the time. I’m copying some info from A website on family court statistics <a href="http://www.childrensjustice.org/stats.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.childrensjustice.org/stats.htm</a></p>
<p>  Statistics<br />
&#8220;Ninety percent of divorced fathers have less than full custody of their children.&#8221; Jonathan M. Honeycutt, Ph.D.(c), M.P.A., M.A., I.P.C. Director of Research, Clinical &amp; Consulting Psychotherapist, National Institute for Divorce Research, Panama City, Florida.</p>
<p>Children from fatherless homes account for:<br />
·	63% of youth suicides. (Source: US Dept. of Health &amp; Human Services, Bureau of the Census).<br />
·	71% of pregnant teenagers. (Source: US Dept. of Health &amp; Human Services)<br />
·	90% of all homeless and runaway children.<br />
·	70% of juveniles in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes (Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988)<br />
·	85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders. (Source: Center for Disease Control).<br />
·	80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger. (Source: Criminal Justice &amp; Behavior, Vol. 14, p. 403-26, 1978).<br />
·	71% of all high school dropouts. (Source: National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools).<br />
·	75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers. (Source: Rainbows for all God`s Children).<br />
·	85% of all youths sitting in prisons. (Source: Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections 1992). </p>
<p>The State of Fatherhood<br />
·	37.9% of fathers have no access/visitation rights. (Source: p.6, col.II, para. 6, lines 4 &amp; 5, Census Bureau P-60, #173, Sept 1991.)<br />
·	&#8220;40% of mothers reported that they had interfered with the non-custodial father&#8217;s visitation on at least one occasion, to punish the ex-spouse.&#8221; (Source: p. 449, col. II, lines 3-6, (citing Fulton) Frequency of visitation by Divorced Fathers; Differences in Reports by Fathers and Mothers. Sanford Braver et al, Am. J. of Orthopsychiatry, 1991.)<br />
·	&#8220;Overall, approximately 50% of mothers &#8220;see no value in the father`s continued contact with his children&#8230;.&#8221; (Source: Surviving the Breakup, Joan Kelly &amp; Judith Wallerstein, p. 125)<br />
·	Only 11% of mothers value their husband&#8217;s input when it comes to handling problems with their kids. Teachers &amp; doctors rated 45%, and close friends &amp; relatives rated 16%.(Source: EDK Associates survey of 500 women for Redbook Magazine. Redbook, November 1994, p. 36)<br />
·	&#8220;The former spouse (mother) was the greatest obstacle to having more frequent contact with the children.&#8221; (Source: Increasing our understanding of fathers who have infrequent contact with their children, James Dudley, Family Relations, Vol. 4, p. 281, July 1991.)<br />
·	&#8220;A clear majority (70%) of fathers felt that they had too little time with their children.&#8221; (Source: Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Mary Ann Kock &amp; Carol Lowery, Journal of Divorce, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 54, Winter 1984.)<br />
·	&#8220;Very few of the children were satisfied with the amount of contact with their fathers, after divorce.&#8221; (Source: Visitation and the Noncustodial Father, Koch &amp; Lowery, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 50, Winter 1984.)<br />
·	&#8220;Feelings of anger towards their former spouses hindered effective involvement on the part of fathers; angry mothers would sometimes sabotage father&#8217;s efforts to visit their children.&#8221; (Source: Ahrons and Miller, Am. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 63. p. 442, July `93.)<br />
·	&#8220;Mothers may prevent visits to retaliate against fathers for problems in their marital or post-marital relationship.&#8221; (Source: Seltzer, Shaeffer &amp; Charing, Journal of Marriage &amp; the Family, Vol. 51, p. 1015, November 1989.)<br />
·	In a study: &#8220;Visitational Interference &#8211; A National Study&#8221; by Ms. J Annette Vanini, M.S.W. and Edward Nichols, M.S.W., it was found that 77% of non-custodial fathers are NOT able to &#8220;visit&#8221; their children, as ordered by the court, as a result of &#8220;visitation interference&#8221; perpetuated by the custodial parent. In other words, non-compliance with court ordered visitation is three times the problem of non-compliance with court ordered child support and impacts the children of divorce even more. Originally published Sept. 1992 </p>
<p>Child Support<br />
·	Information from multiple sources shows that only 10% of all noncustodial fathers fit the &#8220;deadbeat dad&#8221; category: 90% of the fathers with joint custody paid the support due. Fathers with visitation rights pay 79.1%; and 44.5% of those with NO visitation rights still financially support their children. (Source: Census Bureau report. Series P-23, No. 173).<br />
·	Additionally, of those not paying support, 66% are not doing so because they lack the financial resources to pay (Source: GAO report: GAO/HRD-92-39 FS).<br />
·	The Poverty Studies Institute at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, discovered in 1993 that 52% of fathers who owe child support earn less than $6,155 per year.<br />
·	66% of single mothers work less than full time while only 10% of fathers fall into this category. In addition, almost 47% of non-custodial mothers default on support compared with the 27% of fathers who default. (Source: Garansky and Meyer, DHHS Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, 1991).<br />
·	Total Custodial Mothers: 11,268,000. Total Custodial Fathers 2,907,000 (Source: Current Population Reports, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Series P-20, No. 458, 1991).<br />
·	66% of all support not paid by non-custodial fathers is due to inability to pay. (Source: U.S. General Accounting Office Report, GAO/HRD-92-39FS January 1992).<br />
The following is sourced from: Technical Analysis Paper No. 42, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Income Security Policy, Oct. 1991, Authors: Meyer and Garansky.<br />
·	Custodial mothers who receive a support award: 79.6%<br />
·	Custodial fathers who receive a support award: 29.9%<br />
·	Non-custodial mothers who totally default on support: 46.9%<br />
·	Non-custodial fathers who totally default on support: 26.9%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tazmandew</title>
		<link>http://independenceamerica.com/events/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>tazmandew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independenceamerica.com/?page_id=7#comment-4</guid>
		<description>If you truly want to create the “big tent party” then learn the lesson that Obama has taught the Republicans and take it the next step. Technology will make the next party great. Instead of parties and candidates taking a stance and waiting for people to follow, let the people of your party speak and then take their stance. Simply setting up a web site where everyone fully registers like a voter and all the issues/bills etc. are explained (truthfully please) and all of the members of your party can “vote” and our elected Congressman would then vote and stand for us accordingly. We would not be forced to settle for a candidate given to us by the party. We would truly be ruled by the majority of the constituency of the candidate. A candidate who truly represents the will of the people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you truly want to create the “big tent party” then learn the lesson that Obama has taught the Republicans and take it the next step. Technology will make the next party great. Instead of parties and candidates taking a stance and waiting for people to follow, let the people of your party speak and then take their stance. Simply setting up a web site where everyone fully registers like a voter and all the issues/bills etc. are explained (truthfully please) and all of the members of your party can “vote” and our elected Congressman would then vote and stand for us accordingly. We would not be forced to settle for a candidate given to us by the party. We would truly be ruled by the majority of the constituency of the candidate. A candidate who truly represents the will of the people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

